Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

Reading:

Background Information

Understanding the facts and constitutional questions

🔗 Connecting to Our Guiding Question

When, if ever, should the government be allowed to limit a person's constitutional rights in order to protect the community?

This case asks: Should the government be able to limit the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection rights (by allowing segregation) to maintain what some claimed was community order and tradition? Consider how this case balances individual rights to equal treatment against arguments about community stability and local control.

What Happened?

In the 1950s, many states had laws requiring racial segregation in public schools. These laws said that Black children and white children could not attend the same schools. This system was called "separate but equal" - the idea that as long as both races had schools, it was constitutional to keep them separate.

Linda Brown was a Black third-grader who lived in Topeka, Kansas. Every day, Linda had to walk six blocks through a dangerous railroad switchyard, then take a bus to Monroe Elementary School, the school designated for Black children. This journey was long and potentially dangerous.

However, there was another elementary school, Sumner School, just seven blocks from Linda's home. Linda could not attend Sumner School because it was designated for white children only.

In 1951, Linda's father, Oliver Brown, tried to enroll Linda at Sumner School. The school refused to admit her based solely on her race. Oliver Brown was frustrated and contacted the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People).

The NAACP decided to challenge the "separate but equal" doctrine. They combined Linda's case with similar cases from South Carolina, Virginia, Delaware, and Washington D.C. Twelve other families joined the lawsuit.

The Big Question

Does racial segregation in public schools violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? Even if the separate schools are equal in quality?

What You Need to Know

The Fourteenth Amendment says:

"No State shall...deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

This means all people must be treated equally under the law.

The previous legal doctrine of "separate but equal" came from an 1896 case called Plessy v. Ferguson, which said segregation was constitutional as long as the facilities were equal.

Important Facts

  • Linda Brown was in third grade when the case began
  • She had to travel much farther to school than necessary because of segregation
  • The case combined five different lawsuits from different states
  • Even when facilities appeared equal, segregation caused psychological harm to Black children
  • The NAACP used social science research to show the harmful effects of segregation
  • This case overturned nearly 60 years of "separate but equal" precedent

Vocabulary

Segregation: The practice of separating people based on race
Equal Protection Clause: Part of the Fourteenth Amendment requiring equal treatment under law
Separate but Equal: The legal doctrine that segregation was acceptable if facilities were equal
NAACP: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, a civil rights organization
Precedent: Previous court decisions that guide future cases

Argument Sorting Activity

Work with your group to sort these arguments

Instructions: Read each argument below and select which side it helps from the dropdown menu. When you're finished, click "Check Answers" to see your results.

The Two Sides

Argument Answer
The Fourteenth Amendment requires that all people be treated equally under the law.
The "separate but equal" rule has been the law since 1896 and has worked for many years.
Separating people by race automatically suggests that one race is inferior to another.
Both Black and white schools have similar buildings, teachers, and educational materials.
Research shows that segregation causes psychological harm to Black children.
Forcing integration could cause social problems and conflicts in communities.
Education is too important to allow racial discrimination in public schools.
States should have the right to organize their school systems based on local traditions.
Even when facilities look equal, segregated schools are inferior in reputation and opportunities.
The Fourteenth Amendment was not originally intended to require integrated schools.
Government cannot classify and separate people based on their race.
"Separate but equal" has worked effectively for nearly 60 years without major problems.

Key Terms for Arguments

Important concepts to understand when debating this case

Inherently Unequal

The idea that separation itself creates inequality, regardless of the quality of facilities.

Psychological Harm

The emotional and mental damage caused by segregation, particularly to children.

Social Science Evidence

Research studies showing the harmful effects of segregation on children.

Connecting to Today

How these constitutional questions still matter

Questions about educational equality and segregation remain relevant 70 years after this case. Consider these modern situations:

School Funding

Resource Inequalities

Today, schools in wealthier neighborhoods often have more resources, better facilities, and more experienced teachers than schools in poorer areas. Many argue this creates a new form of unequal education.

Think about: Does "equal protection" require equal school funding, or just the same legal access?

Demographics

Neighborhood Segregation

Many schools remain largely separated by race - not because of laws, but because neighborhoods are segregated. This is called "de facto" (in practice) segregation versus "de jure" (by law) segregation.

Think about: Should the Equal Protection Clause address segregation that happens without explicit laws?

Current Debate

School Choice Programs

Some advocate for charter schools, vouchers, or magnet schools to give families more options. Others worry these programs could increase segregation by allowing families to leave diverse public schools.

Think about: How do we balance family choice with the goal of integrated education?

Discussion Questions

  • If schools are no longer segregated by law but remain mostly one race, is that still a constitutional problem?
  • How might unequal school funding relate to the Equal Protection Clause?
  • Should the Constitution guarantee equal educational opportunities, or just equal legal treatment?

Additional Resources

Go deeper with these resources

🎧 Audio

Oyez Case Summary and Audio

Listen Now →
📺 Video

Brown Foundation Videos

Watch Now →
📺 Video

PBS Learning Media

Watch Now →
📄 Document

National Archives Materials

Read Now →